-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
feat: add inline tool definition and chain in chain 🤯 #75
New issue
Have a question about this project? # for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “#”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? # to your account
Conversation
470dbc7
to
a794af9
Compare
- service: 'llm_chain.chain.research' | ||
name: 'wikipedia_research' | ||
description: 'Can research on Wikipedia' | ||
is_chain: true |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
While thinking about this, do we really need this? We know service
is a ChainInterface
🤔
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
another thing of writing could be:
- service: 'llm_chain.chain.research'
+ chain: 'llm_chain.chain.research'
name: 'wikipedia_research'
description: 'Can research on Wikipedia'
- is_chain: true
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
but I think I would just remove the is_chain
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i tried to omit that thing, but failed 😢
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
but why, don't we know at that time, that the service is an instance of ChainInterface
?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i'm with you on this, but i just don't know how 😆
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Alright then, but I can also set is_chain true and add anything else in service then, but we can communicate that with a clear error I guess
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
wait a sec
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
waiting again ... ⏳ 😄
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
a794af9
to
d816e9d
Compare
No description provided.